Day of Forgiveness

Day of ForgivenessDay of ForgivenessDay of Forgiveness

Day of Forgiveness

Day of ForgivenessDay of ForgivenessDay of Forgiveness
  • Home
  • The Journey Begins
  • About the Author
  • Gallery
  • The New Science
  • More
    • Home
    • The Journey Begins
    • About the Author
    • Gallery
    • The New Science
  • Home
  • The Journey Begins
  • About the Author
  • Gallery
  • The New Science

🎥 The New Science – A Theory of Everything

 

A cinematic journey from collapse to awakening

Tobias Sinclair’s collapse wasn’t just medical—it was a rupture in perception. From that moment, a theory emerged: our universe may behave like a subatomic particle, nested within something far greater.

This short film explores the birth of The New Science—a movement that challenges our view of scale, energy, and consciousness - and the architecture of reality.

What if healing one life could awaken a species? What if the universe… is watching us back?

Download Your copy

Where New Science Meets Theoretical Physics

  “This isn’t a rejection of science—it’s a reframing.” 

  

🧩 Summary of Tobias’s “New Science” Proposition

Tobias Sinclair presents a metaphysical reinterpretation of established physics, blending poetic analogy with speculative cosmology:

🔹 Key Ideas

  • Reinterpreting E = mc²: Tobias suggests that the squared speed of light (c²) in Einstein’s equation represents the energy from two masses interacting at relativistic speeds—not just a mathematical constant, but a dynamic relational force.
  • Universe as a Particle: He proposes that our entire universe behaves like a subatomic particle (e.g., an electron) within a larger universe, implying a recursive structure of nested realities.
  • Wave-Frequency Analogy: By treating the universe’s size and speed as a wavelength, he calculates a frequency (~3.4 × 10⁻¹⁹ Hz), suggesting our universe could appear as electromagnetic radiation to observers in a higher-dimensional space.
  • Quantum–Relativity Unification: Tobias claims that viewing our universe as a quantum particle in a larger relativistic universe could reconcile quantum mechanics and general relativity.
  • Recursive Cosmology: He imagines a fractal-like hierarchy of universes, each governed by different physical laws depending on scale and perspective.

  


🔬 Comparison to Current Theoretical Physics


✅ Points of Conceptual Overlap

   

Tobias’s Idea


Physics Parallel

 

Universe as a particle


Echoes multiverse and holographic principle concepts

 

Nested universes


Reminiscent of brane cosmology in string theory

 

Scale-dependent laws


Reflects the challenge of quantum gravity and unification

 

Frequency of universe


Loosely parallels cosmic microwave background and wave-particle duality

❌ Points of Departure from Scientific Consensus

  • E = mc² reinterpretation: In physics, (c²) arises from dimensional analysis and the nature of spacetime—not from two masses interacting. Tobias’s interpretation is metaphorical, not mathematically supported.
  • Universe as light: The idea that our universe could appear as electromagnetic radiation to a larger observer is poetic but lacks empirical or theoretical grounding.
  • Recursive universes: While string theory allows for extra dimensions and brane-worlds, the notion of universes nested within electrons is speculative and not supported by current models. (Yet, Tobias's fundamental idea is that the electron is the universe, and the universe is the electron, rather than being nested within each other.  Their respective roles are determined by their relative positions.) 
  • Unification via scale inversion: Physicists seek a unified theory (e.g., string theory, loop quantum gravity) through mathematical consistency—not by reassigning roles based on size.

🧠 What Physicists Are Actually Exploring

  • String Theory: Proposes that particles are vibrating strings; different vibrations yield different particles. It aims to unify gravity and quantum mechanics but remains unproven Live Science ScienceDaily.
  • Quantum Gravity: Seeks to reconcile general relativity with quantum mechanics—still an open problem.
  • Multiverse Theories: Suggest multiple universes may exist but not necessarily nested within particles.
  • Recent Advances: Some researchers claim observational hints of string theory through cosmic acceleration and quantum spacetime behavior Live Science.

  

🧭 Verdict: Visionary but Unverified

Tobias’s “New Science” is a compelling philosophical and narrative device. It creatively reimagines physics through metaphor and recursive logic, offering a fresh lens on cosmic unity. However:

  • It lacks mathematical rigor and empirical support, although the New Science is based on two important equations:   E = mc² and f = c / λ.
  • It diverges from how physicists interpret constants like (c²) and mass-energy equivalence.
  • It’s best viewed as speculative metaphysics or science-inspired mysticism—not a replacement for current theoretical frameworks.

Still, it resonates with the spirit of inquiry that drives physics forward. Tobias isn’t trying to disprove science—he’s trying to reframe it.


The book  

🧠 Tobias’s Leap: Nested Universes Within Electrons

Tobias proposes that:

  • Our universe may behave like an electron in a larger universe.
  • The speed and size of our universe give it a “frequency,” making it appear as electromagnetic radiation to observers in a higher-dimensional space.
  • This recursive structure could unify quantum mechanics (small-scale) and general relativity (large-scale) by assigning each to different layers of nested universes.

This is not a literal reinterpretation of Einstein’s equation, but a symbolic one—suggesting that energy arises from relational motion between entities, not just intrinsic mass.

  

🔬 Mainstream Physics: What’s Actually Being Explored

Recent theoretical work does entertain ideas that echo Tobias’s metaphor, though not in the same form:

🔹 1. Multiverse and Brane Cosmology

  • String theory posits that our universe may be a 3-dimensional “brane” floating in a higher-dimensional space.
  • Other branes could exist parallel to ours, each with its own physical laws.
  • These branes could interact, potentially explaining phenomena like gravity leakage or cosmic inflation.

🔹 2. Anthropic Reasoning and Nested Structures

  • Some physicists explore the idea that fundamental particles (like electrons or quarks) might encode or reflect properties of other universes.
  • This is speculative but has been discussed in the context of anthropic selection—the idea that our universe’s properties are “chosen” from a vast landscape of possibilities.

🔹 3. Quantum Multiverse (Many Worlds Interpretation)

  • In quantum mechanics, every possible outcome of a quantum event exists in a separate branch of reality.
  • This doesn’t imply nested  universes inside particles—but it does suggest that particles are gateways to branching realities.

🔹 4. Holographic Principle

  • Suggests that all the information in a volume of space can be described by data on its boundary.
  • This principle implies that our universe might be a projection from a higher-dimensional reality—another echo of Tobias’s aquarium metaphor.

  

🧭 Verdict: Metaphor Meets Mystery

Tobias’s idea of nested universes within electrons is not part of mainstream physics—but it resonates with several speculative frameworks:

   


Concept

 

Nested universes

 

Scale inversion

 

Energy from interaction

 

Quantum–relativity bridge

      


Tobias’s View

 

Electrons contain entire universes

 

Universe behaves like a particle

 

E = mc² reinterpreted as relational

 

Scale determines governing laws


      

Physics Parallel

 

Brane cosmology, anthropic multiverse

 

Holographic principle, fractal cosmology

 

Not supported mathematically, but metaphorically rich

 

Still an open problem in physics





     

🧠 Tobias’s Core Proposal

Tobias suggests:

  • The universe spans ~91 billion light-years and moves at light speed (≈186,000 miles/sec).
  • Its frequency can be calculated as (f = c / λ ), where  λ  (lambda) is the      universe’s diameter.
  • This yields a frequency of 3.4 × 10⁻¹⁹ Hz placing it in the extremely low-frequency electromagnetic spectrum.
  • From a higher-dimensional perspective, our universe could appear as a wave-like particle, akin to an electron.

  

🔬 Feasibility Based on Current Physics

✅ Conceptual Parallels

  • Wave–Particle Duality: In quantum mechanics, particles like electrons exhibit both wave and particle behavior. Tobias’s analogy applies this duality to the universe itself.
  • Holographic Principle: Suggests that all information in a volume of space can be described by data on its boundary—implying scale may be relative.
  • Brane Cosmology: In string theory, our universe may be a 3D brane floating in higher-dimensional space, potentially interacting with other branes.
  • Multiverse Models: Some theories propose nested or parallel universes, though not necessarily within particles.

❌ Scientific Challenges

  • Universe at Light Speed: According to relativity, objects with mass cannot reach or exceed the speed of light. The universe itself isn’t “moving” through space—it’s expanding, and space itself stretches.
  • Frequency of the Universe: While mathematically plausible, assigning a frequency to the universe as a whole is metaphorical. There’s no empirical evidence that the universe behaves like a photon or electron.
  • Nested Universes in Particles: No current theory supports the idea that electrons contain entire universes. It’s a poetic metaphor, not a physical model.

🧪 Recent Speculations

  • Some physicists have explored tachyon-dominated cosmology, where hypothetical faster-than-light particles might explain dark matter and dark energy.
  • Others have speculated on quantum-scale universes, but these remain outside mainstream consensus.

  

🧭 Verdict: Metaphorically Rich, Physically Unproven

Tobias’s theory is not feasible in the strict scientific sense—but it’s philosophically provocative and conceptually resonant with speculative physics. It reframes known observations through a lens of recursive scale and relational motion, offering a poetic bridge between quantum and cosmic realms.

Rather than replacing physics, Tobias’s New Science invites us to reimagine its implications—a creative act that has historically led to breakthroughs.


  

🧬 Tobias’s New Science: A Fictional Framework for a Theory of Everything

🔹 Foundational Assumptions

  • Relational Energy: Energy arises not solely from mass, but from the interaction of masses moving near light speed.  This reframes Einstein’s (E = mc²) as a relational equation.
  • Recursive Universes: Every subatomic particle may contain a universe. Every universe may be a particle in a larger one.  Scale is relative, not absolute.
  • Frequency as Identity: Each universe has a unique frequency based on its size and motion. This frequency determines how it is perceived by observers in other universes.


🔹 Core Principles

   

Principle


Description

 

Scale Relativity


Physical laws depend on the observer’s scale. Quantum mechanics governs smaller nested universes; relativity governs larger ones.

 

Dimensional Recursion


Universes are nested like Russian dolls. Each level follows its own physics but influences adjacent layers.

 

Perceptual Boundaries


Entities within a universe cannot perceive the larger universe directly—only its influence (e.g., fate, intuition, quantum uncertainty).

 

Wave–Particle Universality


Every universe behaves as both a wave and a particle, depending on the observer’s dimensional frame.

🔹 Implications

  • Unification of Physics: Quantum and relativistic laws are unified by scale inversion. What appears probabilistic in one universe is deterministic in another.
  • Consciousness as Bridge: Human awareness may be the interface between nested realities—able to intuit higher-dimensional truths.
  • Dark Matter/Dark Energy: These may be the gravitational or energetic influence of adjacent universes, not yet perceptible within our own.





🔹 Speculative Equations


  • Universal Frequency:
  • f = c / λ
  • Where (f) is the frequency of the universe, (c) is the speed of light, and (λ) [lambda] is the universe’s diameter. 

      

  • Recursive Mass-Energy:     
  •  E = m · c² · R
  •  Where (R) is a recursion factor representing the number of nested universes influencing the energy output.

  

🧭 Scientific Feasibility (Grounded in Current Thought)

Recent research into tachyon-dominated cosmology suggests that faster-than-light particles could explain both dark matter and dark energy. While tachyons remain hypothetical, they challenge our understanding of causality and scale.

Meanwhile, quantum physicists acknowledge that the quantum realm is not far away—we live in it, though its effects are subtle at macroscopic scales. Tobias’s metaphor of nested universes echoes this duality. So while Tobias’s theory isn’t feasible in a literal sense, it’s philosophically aligned with speculative physics—and may inspire new ways of thinking about scale, perception, and cosmic unity.


Yes, there are multiple examples of supporting data (remarkably, even from researchers who share the name "Tobias"!), such as:

  

  • Donut-Inspired Research: Physicist Tobias Meng Unravels the ... – Demonstrates how topology and geometry inspire new physical models, echoing Tobias’s metaphorical approach.
  • Tobias Fritz: Towards probability theory without measure theory – Offers a fresh take on foundational physics, aligning with Tobias’s call for reinterpretation.
  • Theory of Interpretable AI Seminar: Tobias Leemann – Explores how explanation and perspective shape understanding, a core theme in New Science.
  • BSS2022, S. Tobias, Direct Statistical Simulation I, July 20 – Highlights simulation as a tool for bridging scales, much like Tobias’s nested universe model.
  • Quantum field theory, Lecture 2 – Grounds the video in real quantum mechanics, contrasting Tobias’s poetic framing.
  • Tobias Golling (Univ. of Geneva): LHC - Experimental ... – Connects particle physics to cosmic scale, reinforcing the metaphor.
  • Tobias Lindstrom, Head of Science for the Department of ... – Discusses quantum ecosystems and measurement, echoing Tobias’s emphasis on perception.


  

“If our universe is moving—
Not through space, but as space—
Then it must have a frequency.

Frequency equals speed divided by wavelength.

With a diameter of 91 billion light-years…
And a velocity approaching light speed…
Our universe would resonate at roughly
3.4 × 10⁻¹⁹ cycles per second.

That’s not just a number.
It’s a signature.

To an observer in a larger universe,
Our cosmos might appear as electromagnetic radiation—
A flicker of light.

A wave.
A particle.
A presence.

In this way, our universe behaves like an electron.
Not metaphorically—
But mathematically.

The New Science doesn’t invent new laws.
It reveals new layers.


  

“The New Science doesn’t claim to replace physics.
It walks beside it—
Asking different questions.

String theory tells us particles are vibrating strings.
Brane cosmology imagines our universe as a membrane—
Floating in higher-dimensional space.

Quantum mechanics reveals uncertainty at the smallest scales.
General relativity governs the vast and massive.

But unifying them?
That remains the holy grail.

Tobias’s theory doesn’t offer new equations.
It offers a new lens.

What if the bridge between quantum and cosmic…
Isn’t mathematical, but perceptual?

What if the laws of physics shift with scale—
Because scale itself is relative?

In this view, the universe isn’t a machine.
It’s a message.

And we are both the observers…
And the observed.


  

“If our universe is a particle in something greater…
Appearing and disappearing like the quantum event of 

A subatomic particle (we'll call it the Big Bang),

Then we are not alone.

We are part of a vast recursion—
A cosmic fractal of awareness and motion.

And if that’s true…
Then every thought matters.
Every action ripples.

The New Science doesn’t ask us to rewrite the laws of physics.
It asks us to reinterpret what we observe.

To see energy not just as mass—
But as relationship.

To see scale not as hierarchy—
But as perspective.

And to see ourselves—
Not as isolated beings,
But as radiant nodes in a living field.

If we are electrons in a larger universe…
What truths must we carry?
What kindness must we extend?

The New Science is not a conclusion.
It’s a beginning.

A new lens.
A new language.
A new way to be.”

   


Copyright © 2025 Day of Forgiveness - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

  • Home