A cinematic journey from collapse to awakening
Tobias Sinclair’s collapse wasn’t just medical—it was a rupture in perception. From that moment, a theory emerged: our universe may behave like a subatomic particle, nested within something far greater.
This short film explores the birth of The New Science—a movement that challenges our view of scale, energy, and consciousness - and the architecture of reality.
What if healing one life could awaken a species? What if the universe… is watching us back?
“This isn’t a rejection of science—it’s a reframing.”
🧩 Summary of Tobias’s “New Science” Proposition
Tobias Sinclair presents a metaphysical reinterpretation of established physics, blending poetic analogy with speculative cosmology:
🔹 Key Ideas
🔬 Comparison to Current Theoretical Physics
✅ Points of Conceptual Overlap
Tobias’s Idea
Physics Parallel
Universe as a particle
Echoes multiverse and holographic principle concepts
Nested universes
Reminiscent of brane cosmology in string theory
Scale-dependent laws
Reflects the challenge of quantum gravity and unification
Frequency of universe
Loosely parallels cosmic microwave background and wave-particle duality
❌ Points of Departure from Scientific Consensus
🧠 What Physicists Are Actually Exploring
🧭 Verdict: Visionary but Unverified
Tobias’s “New Science” is a compelling philosophical and narrative device. It creatively reimagines physics through metaphor and recursive logic, offering a fresh lens on cosmic unity. However:
Still, it resonates with the spirit of inquiry that drives physics forward. Tobias isn’t trying to disprove science—he’s trying to reframe it.
The book
🧠 Tobias’s Leap: Nested Universes Within Electrons
Tobias proposes that:
This is not a literal reinterpretation of Einstein’s equation, but a symbolic one—suggesting that energy arises from relational motion between entities, not just intrinsic mass.
🔬 Mainstream Physics: What’s Actually Being Explored
Recent theoretical work does entertain ideas that echo Tobias’s metaphor, though not in the same form:
🔹 1. Multiverse and Brane Cosmology
🔹 2. Anthropic Reasoning and Nested Structures
🔹 3. Quantum Multiverse (Many Worlds Interpretation)
🔹 4. Holographic Principle
🧭 Verdict: Metaphor Meets Mystery
Tobias’s idea of nested universes within electrons is not part of mainstream physics—but it resonates with several speculative frameworks:
Concept
Nested universes
Scale inversion
Energy from interaction
Quantum–relativity bridge
Tobias’s View
Electrons contain entire universes
Universe behaves like a particle
E = mc² reinterpreted as relational
Scale determines governing laws
Physics Parallel
Brane cosmology, anthropic multiverse
Holographic principle, fractal cosmology
Not supported mathematically, but metaphorically rich
Still an open problem in physics
🧠 Tobias’s Core Proposal
Tobias suggests:
🔬 Feasibility Based on Current Physics
✅ Conceptual Parallels
❌ Scientific Challenges
🧪 Recent Speculations
🧭 Verdict: Metaphorically Rich, Physically Unproven
Tobias’s theory is not feasible in the strict scientific sense—but it’s philosophically provocative and conceptually resonant with speculative physics. It reframes known observations through a lens of recursive scale and relational motion, offering a poetic bridge between quantum and cosmic realms.
Rather than replacing physics, Tobias’s New Science invites us to reimagine its implications—a creative act that has historically led to breakthroughs.
🧬 Tobias’s New Science: A Fictional Framework for a Theory of Everything
🔹 Foundational Assumptions
🔹 Core Principles
Principle
Description
Scale Relativity
Physical laws depend on the observer’s scale. Quantum mechanics governs smaller nested universes; relativity governs larger ones.
Dimensional Recursion
Universes are nested like Russian dolls. Each level follows its own physics but influences adjacent layers.
Perceptual Boundaries
Entities within a universe cannot perceive the larger universe directly—only its influence (e.g., fate, intuition, quantum uncertainty).
Wave–Particle Universality
Every universe behaves as both a wave and a particle, depending on the observer’s dimensional frame.
🔹 Implications
🔹 Speculative Equations
🧭 Scientific Feasibility (Grounded in Current Thought)
Recent research into tachyon-dominated cosmology suggests that faster-than-light particles could explain both dark matter and dark energy. While tachyons remain hypothetical, they challenge our understanding of causality and scale.
Meanwhile, quantum physicists acknowledge that the quantum realm is not far away—we live in it, though its effects are subtle at macroscopic scales. Tobias’s metaphor of nested universes echoes this duality. So while Tobias’s theory isn’t feasible in a literal sense, it’s philosophically aligned with speculative physics—and may inspire new ways of thinking about scale, perception, and cosmic unity.
Yes, there are multiple examples of supporting data (remarkably, even from researchers who share the name "Tobias"!), such as:
“If our universe is moving—
Not through space, but as space—
Then it must have a frequency.
Frequency equals speed divided by wavelength.
With a diameter of 91 billion light-years…
And a velocity approaching light speed…
Our universe would resonate at roughly
3.4 × 10⁻¹⁹ cycles per second.
That’s not just a number.
It’s a signature.
To an observer in a larger universe,
Our cosmos might appear as electromagnetic radiation—
A flicker of light.
A wave.
A particle.
A presence.
In this way, our universe behaves like an electron.
Not metaphorically—
But mathematically.
The New Science doesn’t invent new laws.
It reveals new layers.
“The New Science doesn’t claim to replace physics.
It walks beside it—
Asking different questions.
String theory tells us particles are vibrating strings.
Brane cosmology imagines our universe as a membrane—
Floating in higher-dimensional space.
Quantum mechanics reveals uncertainty at the smallest scales.
General relativity governs the vast and massive.
But unifying them?
That remains the holy grail.
Tobias’s theory doesn’t offer new equations.
It offers a new lens.
What if the bridge between quantum and cosmic…
Isn’t mathematical, but perceptual?
What if the laws of physics shift with scale—
Because scale itself is relative?
In this view, the universe isn’t a machine.
It’s a message.
And we are both the observers…
And the observed.
“If our universe is a particle in something greater…
Appearing and disappearing like the quantum event of
A subatomic particle (we'll call it the Big Bang),
Then we are not alone.
We are part of a vast recursion—
A cosmic fractal of awareness and motion.
And if that’s true…
Then every thought matters.
Every action ripples.
The New Science doesn’t ask us to rewrite the laws of physics.
It asks us to reinterpret what we observe.
To see energy not just as mass—
But as relationship.
To see scale not as hierarchy—
But as perspective.
And to see ourselves—
Not as isolated beings,
But as radiant nodes in a living field.
If we are electrons in a larger universe…
What truths must we carry?
What kindness must we extend?
The New Science is not a conclusion.
It’s a beginning.
A new lens.
A new language.
A new way to be.”